And let me dispel the myth about Republicans would like to see the rich get richer. Who provides you a job? Answer? Someone who has money or someone who has invested in a product or a service, not someone who holds a protest sign, has sex with anything that moves, sits at home and smokes weed or burns an American Flag. In other words, if you give breaks to have economic incentives will make jobs for you!

By keeping money in the hands of wealthy people who are willing to become investors into a service, invention, or product, then you have the money in the hands of people not the government handing it out to people. The problem comes when wealthy people don’t do this, but most people who know anything about money and capitalism realizes that in order to maintain your wealth the best thing you can do is invest it and create more capital, or give it away to get a lower tax bracket.

On the other hand being fiscally liberal translates to more government subsidizing and becoming a slave to the system rather than being an individual who can make money and get wealthy and contribute your ideas or investments rather than invest into more government.

Republicans do believe in the above, and if you want to believe in a socialist state, then move to frickin China or the re-forming Soviet Union.

I don’t think Bush should’ve put Michael D. Brown to head FEMA. That was dumb, but to say Bush is racist and hates black is absolutely ludicrous. The problem was not Bush (besides Brown). The ones who had more to blame for this were New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin, and Governor Blanco…after that, then Brown.

READ IT UP FOR YOURSELF HOW MUCH NAGIN MADE THE EVACUATION A TOTAL FUBAR for those in St. Bernard Parish especially. Also many of those people refused to leave. So stop the lip flapping about Bush being a racist already.

If this war is about oil, how much oil have we seen come out of Iraq? And if that were the case our economy would be offset right now. Asit stands, do you see that?

This war, contrary to liberal view, is not about oil. If it is, show me the evidence? President Bush didn’t send our troops over there to take a bullet for oil. It was the fact that there was a threat of WMD’s and a tyrant who had billions of dollars of revenue to support anti American groups, including Terrorist Organizations…whether or not he did, doesn’t matter. You would have to be a complete idiot to think that Saddam wouldn’t support terrorism against the United States.

WMD’s yeah, I know what you are going to say “Where are they?” They are out there. They already found Modern Tactical Russian Aircraft under the sand. They will be found. And if they aren’t that doesn’t mean they weren’t there. Even if they can’t be found, so what? We gave freedom to the Iraqi people. That in itself is something we should be supportive about… don’t they deserve it, just like you do?

If anyone has problems with U.S. intervention in Iraq, and are a Clinton fan, then perhaps you should rethink that past President’s foreign policy if you want to talk about American soldiers dying for stupid causes? Kosovo, Somalia and especially Haiti and Sarajevo… not to say that none of those people didn’t deserve freedom, but I think restoring a Voodoo Dictator to Haiti is a lot dumber than anything Bush did regarding foreign policy.

In a recent blog someone had mentioned about some young U.S. soldiers committing suicide rather then fight.

If you are a soldier who doesn’t want to fight and feels like committing suicide instead? Then perhaps you need to reevaluate what the job of being a soldier entails and if you are not willing to make that ultimate sacrifice (which could entail your death), then don’t join. Don’t join for the sake of a G.I. Bill, or whatever. For those who are willing to do whatever it takes to be a model soldier in the field I have to ask you… If you know that the one next to you is going to commit suicide rather than fight, do you want that person watching your back in a fire fight?

Bush didn’t do as bad a job, as every idiot who burns an American flag thinks. He was in a tough era, as far as Presidents go. I think that Gore would’ve been curled up in a fetal position as the planes slammed into the buildings on 9/11. Bush took the bull by the horns, planned out the best strategy TAKING INTO ACCOUNT ONE OF THE MOST FISCALLY POWERFUL ANTI AMERICAN LEADERS (Saddam/Iraq) and struck out.

I think he had one particular moron FEMA Head when it came to Katrina, BUT I THINK THAT THE MAYOR AND THE GOVERNOR OF LA. WERE MORE STUPID THAN ANYONE IN THE WHITEHOUSE .

This is an unpopular war, mainly cause we only see one side of it with the Liberal sympathetic Jerkolism that is puked out all over our air waves. We don’t see our forces rebuilding Iraq, setting up schools, stores, churches. Yeah, some of it was destroyed because of the war, but other places they didn’t even have it because Saddam was an idiot and a vicious tyrant.

People can be quite ignorant at the state that the World is in. They can also be quite selfish and forget about why we fight.

We fight for our freedom. Nobody wants war, but it is in itself a necessity. Why? Because the Brotherhood of Man is a Pipe Dream. It’s great to want it but the reality is there will always be someone who thinks they know better, or wants more. It’s how we run as a human race. Pride causes wars, and sometimes in order to maintain our freedom OR THE FREEDOM OF OTHERS in Iraq’s case. We choose to do the most selfless thing, give our lives for the cause of freedom Liberal, or Conservative. I don’t see what the big deal is in Iraq. I think Clinton’s foreign policy was a lot stupider then Bush ever has been. You can say what you want about this war, but we are eliminating terrorist over there, and our brave young men and women are taking a bullet for you and me! What’s an Islamic wacko going to do? Attack America, or attack Americans here are right there pressing into their back yards?

Think about it, before you start sprouting off about Oil and Greed. These people deserve Freedom just as much as EVERY American does! The thing is most of you screaming peaceniks don’t realize that freedom has a price, there’s or yours it’s all ours.

Most of the media and journalism in our country (USA) is slanted towards the leftwing. And that bothers me. Journalism is reporting the news as it happens without bias. It’s almost impossible to do, but it’s something we need to make an extra effort to report accurately, from all angles. Once that is accomplished then we let the people decide their own view point. That is the prime reason I am more conservatively minded, because people need to make their own decisions based on reporting as unbiased as possible. As long as there is a leftwing that rears it’s head trying to force it’s agenda down my throat, I will remain conservative and a thinker then a reactor, not a reactor then a thinker.

I still believe that reactionary thought is good, within the confines of bringing change for the sake of all, not an agenda. Liberal views cause us to dream and create and these are great tools, but we can use these tools for our own agenda or the good of others. Liberal thinking is not bad when we have the best interest for others, but don’t lambaste others convictions, or religious stances.
Change is good, but changing for the sake of supporting your own selfish whims or wanton desires only leads to totalitarianism either way.

Balance is always needed in government and social discipline in our lives. We can’t be too far to either side, but if I was to be further on one side, it would be conservative thought, followed by liberal ideology within the confines of reaction for a balanced cause.

Conservative views are not bad socially, because they usually take into account the consequences for behavior that could effect the whole of society negatively, or positively.

I don’t see the Liberal agenda as such. It is more do what you feel is right, and try and get your way around the consequences by using alternatives to lower your risk in the future.

The word Liberal and fiscal don’t have much bearing when it come to preparation but more over spending. We must have a balanced view on spending and not become dependent on our Federal Government, but rather be State regulated. This creates a corridor for anyone to go to another State and have a different system that they find more amiable to melt with.
From what I have seen from Liberal spending habits they are put into Government programs, rather then privatized industry, or non profit social organizations. This creates a greater dependency on government and less on individual roles as constituents and also hurting the economy by not supporting Public initiatives, but government subsidizing.